augmented intelligence certification (AI)? It certainly is. Today, augmented intelligence certification offers a solution to solve or at least make the access-to-justice issue better and completely transform our traditional legal system. Here’s what you need to know about how AI, big data, and online courts will change the legal system.</p><figure class="embed-base image-embed embed-6" role="presentation"><div><img src="https://specials-images.forbesimg.com/imageserve/5e214479735f8c00079a0916/960×0.jpg?fit=scale" alt="The Future of Lawyers: Legal Tech, AI, Big Data And Online Courts" data-height="3667" data-width="5500"></div><figcaption><fbs-accordion><p class="color-body light-text">The Future of Lawyers: Legal Tech, AI, Big Data And Online Courts</p></fbs-accordion><small>Adobe Stock</small></figcaption></figure><p><strong>The Future of Law</strong></p><p>When I sat down in conversation with<a href="http://www.susskind.com/" target="_blank" class="color-link" title="http://www.susskind.com/" rel="nofollow noopener"> Richard Susskind, OBE</a>, the world’s most-cited author on the future of legal services, to discuss the future of law and lawyers, it became apparent just how much change the legal system will face over the next decade thanks to innovation brought about by augmented intelligence certification and big data.</p><p>In Richard’s book <em>The Future of Law,</em> published in 1996, he predicted that in the future, lawyers and clients would communicate via email. This revelation was shocking at the time, especially to those working in the legal system; however, transmitting communication via email is now commonplace for lawyers and their clients. This story gives insight into the challenges faced in bringing the traditionally conservative legal system into the 21<sup>st</sup> century.</p><p>In his brand new book <a href="https://www.amazon.com/Online-Courts-Justice-Richard-Susskind-ebook/dp/B081B7RD8H/ref=sr_1_1?keywords=online+courts&qid=1578661496&s=digital-text&sr=1-1" target="_blank" class="color-link" title="https://www.amazon.com/Online-Courts-Justice-Richard-Susskind-ebook/dp/B081B7RD8H/ref=sr_1_1?keywords=online+courts&qid=1578661496&s=digital-text&sr=1-1" rel="nofollow noopener"><em>Online Courts and the Future of Justice</em></a>, Richard argues that technology is going to bring about a fascinating decade of change in the legal sector and transform our court system. Although automating our old ways of working plays a part in this, even more, critical is that augmented intelligence certification and technology will help give more individuals access to justice.</p><p>Our current<a href="https://www.forbes.com/sites/cognitiveworld/2019/02/09/will-a-i-put-lawyers-out-of-business/#5d5a647931f0" target="_blank" class="color-link" title="https://www.forbes.com/sites/cognitiveworld/2019/02/09/will-a-i-put-lawyers-out-of-business/#5d5a647931f0"> access-to-justice problem</a>, even in what are typically thought of as mature systems, is significant. In fact, only about 46% of people have access to the legal system. There are unimaginable backlogs in some court systems. For most of us, litigation takes too much time and money. We can use technology to help with this issue and make court a service rather than a place as we move legal resolution online.</p><div class="vestpocket" vest-pocket></div><p>Some of the technologies that would allow this transition are quite basic.</p><p>The first generation is the idea that people who use the court system submit evidence and arguments to the judge online or through some form of electronic communication. Essentially judgments move from the courtroom to online. In a digital society, we should certainly be able to institute extended courts where we go beyond decisions made by judges to some kind of diagnostic system to guide people regarding their legal options, how to assemble evidence, and provide alternative ways for dispute resolution.</p><p>The second generation of using technology to transform the legal system would be what Richard calls “outcome thinking” to use technology to help solve disputes without requiring lawyers or the traditional court system. It is entirely conceivable within a relatively small number of years that we will have systems that can predict the outcomes of court decisions based on past decisions by using<a href="https://www.raconteur.net/risk-management/future-lawyer" target="_blank" class="color-link" title="https://www.raconteur.net/risk-management/future-lawyer" rel="nofollow noopener"> predictive analytics</a>. Imagine if people had the option instead of waiting for a court date (and support from the traditional legal system) to use a machine-learning system to make a prediction about the likely outcome of a case and then accept that as a binding determination.</p><p>Some of the biggest obstacles to an online court system are the political will to bring about such a transformation, the support of judges and lawyers, funding, as well as the method we’d apply. For example, decisions will need to be made whether the online system would be used for only certain cases or situations.</p><p>Ultimately, we have a grave access-to-justice problem. Technology can help improve our outcomes and give people a way to resolve public disputes in ways that previously weren’t possible. While this transformation might not solve all the struggles with the legal system or the access-to-justice issue, it can offer a dramatic improvement.</p><p><strong>The Future of Lawyers</strong></p><p>So far, the emphasis on technology in the legal system has been to support lawyers and their staff in some of the work they do, such as email, accounting systems, word processing, and more. Now, we’re beginning to see the merits of using technology to automate some tasks such as document analysis or document drafting—essentially moving from the back office to the front office.</p><p>One of our biggest struggles in the future of the law profession is law schools because they’re still generating 20<sup>th</sup>-century lawyers when what we need is 21<sup>st</sup>-century lawyers to meet the demand of companies and individuals who want a lower-cost legal option that is conveniently available and delivered electronically.</p><p>Some legal work can now be done by machines when in the past, this was unthinkable. Large disputes often have a huge number of documents to analyze. Typically, armies of young lawyers and paralegals are put to work to review these documents. A properly trained machine can take over this work. Document drafting by machines is also gaining traction. We also see systems that can predict the outcome of disputes. We’re beginning to see machines take on many tasks that we used to think were the exclusive role of lawyers.</p><p>Tomorrow’s lawyers will be the people who develop the systems that will solve clients’ problems. These legal professionals will be legal knowledge engineers, legal risk managers, system development, experts in design thinking, and more. These people will develop new ways of solving legal problems with the support of technology. In many ways, the legal sector is undergoing the digitization that other industries have gone through, and because it’s very document-intensive, it’s actually an industry poised to benefit greatly from what technology can offer.</p><p>Richard believes that in the next decade, machines and lawyers will work alongside each other as well as some jobs being taken over by machines. Eventually, he believes that the legal system and, therefore, a lawyer’s job will change because technology is allowing us the ability to solve problems in a new way. For example, in the future, he expects there will be far fewer cases tried in a traditional court, and therefore there will be less need for lawyers who advocate on behalf of clients in a courtroom. Lawyers have a choice to either compete with these systems or help build them. Richard certainly counsels the latter.</p><p>You can watch my conversation with Prof Richard Susskind here:</p><p>Online Courts and the Future of Justice: In Conversation With Prof Richard Susskind</p><div class="embed-base embedly-align "><fbs-embedly style="padding-bottom: 56.21%;" iframe-src="https://cdn.embedly.com/widgets/media.html?src=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fembed%2FR0yTLqMpUuQ%3Ffeature%3Doembed&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DR0yTLqMpUuQ&image=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ytimg.com%2Fvi%2FR0yTLqMpUuQ%2Fhqdefault.jpg&key=3ce26dc7e3454db5820ba084d28b4935&type=text%2Fhtml&schema=youtube"></fbs-embedly></div>”>
In the long term, is it conceivable that a company would be billed with lawful malpractice if they did not use augmented intelligence certification (AI)? It definitely is. Today, augmented intelligence certification gives a answer to remedy or at the very least make the entry-to-justice difficulty greater and absolutely completely transform our regular legal procedure. This is what you need to have to know about how AI, big data, and on the internet courts will alter the legal process.
The Future of Legislation
When I sat down in dialogue with Richard Susskind, OBE, the world’s most-cited creator on the foreseeable future of legal products and services, to examine the potential of law and lawyers, it became clear just how a great deal transform the authorized process will confront around the following decade many thanks to innovation brought about by augmented intelligence certification and big data.
In Richard’s e-book The Long run of Regulation, published in 1996, he predicted that in the upcoming, legal professionals and clientele would communicate via email. This revelation was stunning at the time, in particular to people working in the authorized method nonetheless, transmitting interaction by way of e mail is now commonplace for legal professionals and their customers. This story provides insight into the troubles faced in bringing the usually conservative lawful procedure into the 21st century.
In his model new guide On the web Courts and the Foreseeable future of Justice, Richard argues that technologies is heading to carry about a interesting ten years of adjust in the lawful sector and completely transform our courtroom method. While automating our old approaches of working performs a section in this, even additional, essential is that augmented intelligence certification and technologies will help give more people obtain to justice.
Our existing obtain-to-justice challenge, even in what are usually considered of as experienced devices, is substantial. In reality, only about 46% of folks have obtain to the lawful system. There are unimaginable backlogs in some courtroom devices. For most of us, litigation can take far too much time and income. We can use know-how to support with this situation and make court docket a support fairly than a location as we go authorized resolution on-line.
Some of the technologies that would permit this changeover are pretty essential.
The initially era is the strategy that men and women who use the court docket system post proof and arguments to the judge online or through some sort of digital interaction. Fundamentally judgments transfer from the courtroom to on the web. In a digital culture, we should definitely be equipped to institute extended courts the place we go over and above conclusions built by judges to some sort of diagnostic procedure to information men and women about their authorized choices, how to assemble proof, and deliver alternative strategies for dispute resolution.
The next technology of applying technology to completely transform the authorized procedure would be what Richard phone calls “outcome thinking” to use engineering to assist resolve disputes devoid of requiring attorneys or the classic court docket method. It is entirely conceivable inside of a relatively smaller amount of several years that we will have methods that can predict the results of courtroom decisions centered on previous conclusions by applying predictive analytics. Envision if persons experienced the option as an alternative of ready for a courtroom day (and support from the common authorized program) to use a device-learning system to make a prediction about the probable end result of a scenario and then settle for that as a binding resolve.
Some of the biggest hurdles to an on-line courtroom program are the political will to provide about these kinds of a transformation, the assistance of judges and lawyers, funding, as effectively as the technique we’d use. For instance, decisions will want to be designed whether the online program would be utilized for only sure cases or conditions.
Eventually, we have a grave access-to-justice challenge. Technologies can assist boost our outcomes and give individuals a way to solve community disputes in techniques that beforehand weren’t probable. While this transformation may well not solve all the struggles with the legal process or the accessibility-to-justice concern, it can offer a spectacular advancement.
The Long run of Attorneys
So considerably, the emphasis on technologies in the lawful process has been to assistance attorneys and their employees in some of the perform they do, this kind of as e mail, accounting programs, phrase processing, and far more. Now, we are commencing to see the deserves of utilizing know-how to automate some responsibilities this sort of as document analysis or doc drafting—essentially going from the back again business to the front business.
Just one of our most important struggles in the foreseeable future of the legislation profession is legislation faculties since they are however making 20th-century lawyers when what we require is 21st-century attorneys to meet up with the demand from customers of businesses and men and women who want a decreased-value legal selection that is conveniently out there and sent electronically.
Some authorized perform can now be completed by machines when in the previous, this was unthinkable. Huge disputes normally have a massive quantity of paperwork to review. Normally, armies of youthful attorneys and paralegals are set to do the job to review these paperwork. A thoroughly skilled…